What's your thoughts about the Oracle Corporation? do you think that all Sun Microsystems, Inc opensource projects should be taken over by other company's?
Links about LibreOffice.
http://www.geekosystem.com/openoffice-libreoffice/http://tinyurl.com/32e8qcxhttp://www.downloadsquad.com/2010/09/28/libreoffice-is-openoffice-minus-oracle/http://tinyurl.com/2c4uc9shttp://tinyurl.com/35xeuqjhttp://tinyurl.com/3945prohttp://tinyurl.com/35mby6hIt should also be noted that IBM are also forking OpenOffice.
IBM Lotus Symphony More info about Oracle:

Oracle: Founded in 1977 by Larry Ellison, Bob Miner and Ed Oates, Oracle has always been a proprietary software company, and its relationship with the Open Source was never the best.
3 years ago, having failed to buy Red Hat, Oracle created a Linux distribution based on source code of RHEL, Oracle Unbreakable Linux. That is, Oracle could not fullfill its intent, but found a way to take advantage of the work and expertise of Red Hat. Even worse, began offering to Red Hat's customers its version of Linux, for a much lower price. Tell me about unfair competition...
Oracle recently acquired Sun and has shutdown the Open Solaris operating system, putting in doubt the future of several Open Source projects that were developed by Sun (MySql, Open Office, Virtual Box and others).
To crown the clumsy actions of Oracle, on 12 August 2010, the company sued Google Inc. for patent infringement on the Java platform in its mobile operating system Android.
And Larry Ellison himself said in 2006: "
If an open source product gets good enough, we'll simply take it," showing that Oracle would have no qualms in exploiting the work of the Open Source community.